Global Warming Hoax Crashing Faster Than the Obamacare Website

Warmists Al Gore and Barack Obama are seeing their Global Warming religion crumble

Warmists Al Gore and Barack Obama are seeing their Global Warming religion crumble

You won’t read much about this in the Democrat Media Complex in the United States, but while we’re inundated with a never-ending stream of scandals and lies from the Obama regime, the religion of global warming is crashing faster than the Obamacare website, While this hoax, perhaps the biggest in world history, should have ended with Climategate, recent real scientific data is bringing the religion to its knees. As reported by the UK Daily Mail, peer-reviewed studies reveal three key take-aways:
  • Study says warmer temperatures are largely due to natural 300-year cycles
  • Actual increase in last 17 years lower than almost every prediction
  • Scientists likened continuing pause to a Mexican wave in a stadium
The data, as the article attests, represents a “stunning challenge to climate science orthodoxy,” and says that the new data, “suggests that the scientific majority – whose views are represented by the UN Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) – have underestimated the role of natural cycles and exaggerated that of greenhouse gases.”  It’s parallel to the lies from the Obama regime that a “YouTube video” caused the Benghazi terrorist attacks (it didn’t), or that the Obama NSA is not spying on you (they are), or that you can keep your insurance and doctor, “period,” under Obamacare (you can’t). All the hooey about “the science is settled,” and that “the majority of scientists agree,” has just been debunked.  Do you think the leftists that have used this hoax to further big government’s takeover of every area of our economic freedom will acknowledge this new evidence? Hardly. They’ll double down like they always do. Who are the real deniers? A prediction? No, it’s a fact. Just four days ago, on November 1st, and this was largely ignored by the mainstream media, Obama issued an executive order directing a government-wide effort to boost preparation in states and local communities for the impact of global warming. Where do taxpayers go to get their money back, and more importantly, when do leftists go to get their credibility back? Read More:  UK Daily Mail
Trending Today


  1. CO2 is a “trace gas” in air, insignificant by definition. It absorbs 1/7th as much IR, heat energy, from sunlight as water vapor which has 188 times as many molecules capturing 1200 times as much heat making 99.9% of
    all “global warming.” CO2 does only 0.1% of it. For this we should destroy our economy?

    The Medieval Warming from 800 AD to 1300 AD Micheal Mann erased to make his “hockey stick” was several degrees warmer than anything “global

    warmers” fear. It was 500 years of great abundance for the world.

    The Vostock Ice Core data analysis show CO2 increases follow temperature increases by 800 years 19 times in 450,000 years. That makes temperature change cause and CO2 change effect; not the other way around.

    Carbon combustion generates 80% of our energy. Control and taxing of carbon would give the elected ruling class more power and money than anything since the Magna Carta of 1215 AD.

    Google “Two Minute Conservative,” When you speak ladies will swoon and liberal gentlemen will weep.

    1. It is the truth that will set us free. If you like your mattress you can keep your mattress. If your like your children you can keep your children. If you like the truth you can keep your truth. Mr. Obama has other ideas.

    1. Absolutely false. You can find stories like this in all newspapers and websites, even the beloved American CNN has a section devoted to “wierd” news. American leftists hate the Daily Mail because they say it has a right wing bias. hmm, I suppose it’s okay for them that many other news outlets have a left wing bias? It challenges people to think about issues, which of course pains many who want to be told what to think by the Daily Mirror or the Guardian (lefty rags). Anyway, the author does not cite the newspaper as “science” but tells us this newspaper had the guts to report what scientists have said. I’m wondering now if the leftists get their scientific info from newspapers with liberal biases, since they think newspapers are scientific sources. Maybe they don’t even research what they read in the news, which would explain their ignorance when asking specific questions on their views and how easily they will believe what they are told by their favorite activists/celebrities/news outlets.

  2. Credibility doesn’t matter – most voters believe what the so called mainstream media says and are too lazy to dig out actual facts.