The Pilgrims Failed Experiment With Socialism

 

Pilgrims (1)

With the United States under direct assault from the evils of socialism, and with Thanksgiving Day upon us, it’s timely, appropriate, and necessary to visit the nation’s very first attempt with socialism, nearly four centuries ago. Modern day promotion of these evils are communicated and shielded using code phrases such as common good, equality, fairness, social justice, community (as in the nonexistent “World Community”), and “spreading the wealth around.” All promises of achieving these unachievable ideals come at the cost of personal freedom and individual rights. Americans, especially politicians, educators, and the media, ignore the ultimate failure of such forms of tyranny, and there’s no better example of this than our nation’s first experiment with Socialism. The history you’re about to read has been largely ignored, probably purposely, by the vast majority of our “government-run” educational institutions, that have bias toward furthering their vision of a society of, by, and for the government, and the growth thereof. In 1620, a group of English Puritans left Great Britain and sailed across the Atlantic on the Mayflower. Not only were they breaking away from what they considered religious persecution, but they were leaving the Old World that had been, in their viewpoint, materialistic, selfish, greedy and unprincipled. Their vision of the New World, was to build a society constructed on a new foundation of communal sharing and social altruism. Their aim was based on the Communism of Plato’s Republic, in which there would be no private property and all work, and the harvest thereof, would be shared in common. The outcome of this experiment with “Commune-ism” is documented in the diary of William Bradford, the Governor and head of the colony. The results of this first “collective” were disastrous and led to famine and starvation, both physically and spiritually:
For the young men that were able and fit for labor and service did repine that they should spend their time and strength to work for other men’s wives and children, without recompense. The strong, or men of parts, had no more division of food, clothes, etc. then he that was weak and not able to do a quarter the other could; this was thought injustice. The aged and graver men to be ranked and equalized in labor, and food, clothes, etc. with the meaner and younger sort, thought it some indignant and disrespect unto them. And for men’s wives to be commanded to do service for other men, as dressing their meat, washing their clothes, etc. they deemed it a kind of slavery, neither could husbands brook it. The experience that was had in this common course and condition, tried sundry years, and that amongst the Godly and sober men, may well convince of the vanity and conceit of Plato’s and other ancients; — that the taking away of property, and bringing into a common wealth, would make them happy and flourishing; as if they were wiser than God. For this community (so far as it was) was found to breed confusion and discontent, and retard much employment that would have been to their benefit and comfort.
Having had enough of this failed system, and to avoid further devastation, another system was tried, free enterprise, or “capitalism.” Instead of working for the “common good,” each citizen was responsible for their own survival, had their own private property, and enjoyed the fruit of their individual labor.  The product of this experiment was also written in Bradford’s diaries:
And so assigned to every family a parcel of land, according to the proportion of their number for that end . . . This had a very good success; for it made all hands very industrious, so as much more corn was planted then otherwise would have been by any means the Governor or any other could use, and saved him a great deal of trouble, and gave far better content. The women now went willingly into the field, and took their little-ones with them to set corn, which before would a ledge weakness, and inability; whom to have compelled would have been thought great tyranny and oppression. By this time harvest was come, and instead of famine, now God gave them plenty, and the face of things was changed, to the rejoicing of the hearts of many, for which they blessed God. And the effect of their planting was well seen, for all had, one way or other, pretty well to bring the year about, and some of the abler sort and more industrious had to spare, and sell to others, so as any general want or famine hath not been amongst them since to this day.
The twisted ideology communists progressives would have you believe is that socialistic systems are compassionate. Nothing could be further from the truth. The very ideals that socialists profess are ironically only obtained through capitalism and free enterprise, as the pilgrims learned. The prosperity was so bountiful that they gladly, voluntarily, shared excess (also referred to by the now dirty word, “profit). No heavy, forceful hand of big government was necessary to “spread the wealth around.” The hard lesson that they learned, even though others have not, was that “commune-ism,” socialism, and other forms of collectivism, “altruism,” and Utopia are antithetical with the human nature and spirit. They result in shortages, poverty, resentment, and economic slavery. How long will we ignore human nature and history, ignorantly and naively repeating the same mistakes of the past? Barack Obama’s desire to “spread the wealth” (yours, not his) and for government to plan, regulate and oversee every area of our lives, is not “hope” or “change”. It is as ancient as the illusory delusion in Plato’s Republic. Suckers, Useful idiots and dupes who voted for, and still support this dangerous ideology are putting the country in danger of being plagued by the same outcomes that the Pilgrims were inflicted with. The Pilgrims learned that when freedom thrives, so does hard work, productivity, innovation, and prosperity. Communism, along with its twin tyrannical sisters of socialism and fascism, leads to precisely the opposite. We have the moral duty to fight sleazy, self-serving, misguided, power-hungry, and corrupt politicians that are hell-bent on erasing our freedom in exchange for the promise of a fairy-tale that only exists in the heads of the damnable parasites who seek to rule us. This Thanksgiving, let us remember the first and thank God for the freedoms we have, the lessons we’ve learned, the heritage we’ve been given, and the battle we’re in with those who seek to take them away.
 
  • tsigili

    I doubt there is much historical accuracy in that article, but there is no question that people have to be motivated to earn their own way, or they become worthless people.

    • LEL

      and why would you doubt the story’s historical accuracy? You’ve studied history from that time?

    • HHAMM

      The Diary of William Bradford accounts for the historical accuracy! They tried Communism/Progressivism!! It did not work!!

    • shucky

      You doubt that the passages were the verbatim account of Governor William Bradford, or are you calling the same a liar? In either case, is it a bias against the reasonable conclusions that can be drawn from his recorded eyewitness account that cause you to doubt the veracity of the source?
      In an emergency situation, will you choose to save a total stranger rather than your own mother, wife or daughter? If so, you would be a pathetic excuse for a son, husband or father. Working harder for a “collective” than for your own immediate family is unnatural and unconscionable.
      Socialism defies compassion, logic, common sense, morality and ethics. As a philosophy, it is despicable in every way imaginable. On the other hand, selfless and voluntary CHARITY is among the greatest of virtues. Those who CHOOSE to sacrifice are praiseworthy philanthropists. Those who expect sacrifice from others but not themselves, or expect something from others while feeling neither gratitude nor a desire to repay, are worthy of nothing but scorn.

  • Tigerlake4

    We have a communists government now, and we are headed to the shithouse as a result!! IT DOESN’T WORK!! Keep America strong…shoot a commie!!

  • Lockstein13

    You use THE NEW YORK TIMES as a “reliable” [sic] “source” [sic] for your knowledge?!?

    Sorry for you. I wish you a joyous ThanksFestivus, moron.

  • Lockstein13

    “…socialism is not about equal[ized] results…”
    SHEESH. What utter nitpicking blather.
    ASK THE HUNDREDS OF MILLIONS WHO DIED UNDER IT IF *THEY* CARE ABOUT THE LABEL OF TOTALITARIAN TYRANNY.

    Yes, there *is* a difference. Some saytomato, some say tomahto.
    Some get lost in the trees (you), others see the forest.

  • Lockstein13

    “WORDS HAVE MEANING.”

    Yeah. RIIIIIIIIIIGHT.
    SO SAYETH OBAAAAAAAAAAAAAHHHHMAH.
    (did you come yet?)

    See, your DIFFERENCE WITHOUT A DISTINCTION game doesn’t work with me.
    I SEE what a tool you are.
    GO F OFF.

    Cor Por A Tis M
    GEE. I mean, I’ve heard that word used often by alot of tin-foil-hat Ron Paul anti-Joo crazies…among other so-called libertarians (inculuding the kind who help get STATIST DEMOCRATS get elected under the guise of saying that “there’s *no difference* between D and R)…but: y’know what?

    1) F YOU
    2) TRY USING NORMAL ENGLISH AMONG NORMAL AMERICANS TO PERSUADE THEM.

    Enough of your gibberish.

  • Tigerlake4

    You must be an ovomit commie!!