Illinois Concealed Carry Ban Struck Down By Courts

Posted 12.11.12 by Greg Campbell, TPNN Contributor

By Greg Campbell
TPNN Contributor

In a shocking turn of events that led Illinois State Representative to proclaim, “Christmas came early for law-abiding gun owners,” the 7th Federal Circuit Court of Appeals overturned the decades-old ban on concealed-carrying of firearms in Illinois.

The 2-1 decision was a blow to the long-entrenched anti-gun political establishment of Illinois that until Tuesday, remained the only state in the union to have a complete prohibition against the lawful carrying of a concealed firearm.

Judge Richard Posner wrote in the court’s majority opinion,

“We are disinclined to engage in another round of historical analysis to determine whether eighteenth-century America understood the Second Amendment to include a right to bear guns outside the home. The Supreme Court has decided that the amendment confers a right to bear arms for self-defense, which is as important outside the home as inside…

The theoretical and empirical evidence (which overall is inconclusive) is consistent with concluding that a right to carry firearms in public may promote self-defense. Illinois had to provide us with more than merely a rational basis for believing that its uniquely sweeping ban is justified by an increase in public safety. It has failed to meet this burden.”

The Court also addressed the issue of dangers that lurk outside the home, noting,

“A Chicagoan is a good deal more likely to be attacked on a sidewalk in a rough neighborhood than in his apartment on the 35th floor of the Park Tower.”

The ruling comes at a time in politics where gun control issues are largely discussed, but seldom acted upon as gun control measures have routinely failed to enhance security for the public and, according to several studies, have shown to leave law-abiding citizens more vulnerable to criminals.

The Supreme Court upheld the individual right to firearm ownership in the landmark decision of District of Columbia v. Heller in 2008. This right was affirmed for states in McDonald v. Chicago in 2010.

The Court granted 180 days to “allow the Illinois legislature to craft a new gun law that will impose reasonable limitations, consistent with the public safety and the Second Amendment as interpreted in this opinion, on the carrying of guns in public.”

Already, gun control advocates are trying to decide if whether they should appeal to the Supreme Court or proceed with crafting new legislation to allow for the new mandate. Illinois House Majority Leader Barbara Flynn Currie, a Democrat and gun control advocate, stated,

“If we need to change the law, let us at least craft a law that is very severely constrained and narrowly tailored so that we don’t invite guns out of control on each of our city’s streets. I don’t want people out of control wandering the streets with guns that are out of control.”

While Currie paints a bleak picture, 49 other states have concealed-carry provisions that have not turned the streets into Wild West shootouts.

The battle for gun rights activists is far from over. However, this is a tremendous blow to the stubbornly unmovable politics surrounding firearms in Illinois and day for rejoicing for those who value the Second
Amendment and the right to self-protection.



  • Pingback: http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20130109023216AA0lXUC

  • Pingback: fatcow webmail review

  • Pingback: Joomla templates for a personal portfolio

  • Pingback: Premium Portfolio Site Templates

  • Pingback: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xYkDx0QpiJI

  • Pingback: туроператор по израилю

  • Pingback: туроператор по израилю

  • http://www.facebook.com/jeff.caldwell.5680 Jeff Caldwell

    piss on more government.

  • http://www.facebook.com/jeff.caldwell.5680 Jeff Caldwell

    way to go Illinois.chalk that one down as victory #1.

  • http://www.facebook.com/drlouise.kasper Louise M Kasper

    I’ll bet Obama and his cronies are shivering in their collective shoes. Now they’ll have to actually look over their shoulders as someone other their associates and hierlings will have access to guns. Oh, and criminals will have guns also but if you think about it there’s not much of a difference really. lol

  • http://www.facebook.com/MyComputerGenius Keith T Jenkins

    Here in Texas we are debating an “Open Carry” permit, which would allow the holster to be “revealed” instead of concealed. And, by the way, I believe that our murder rate for our 25,145,561 citizens is less than that of Chicago’s nearly 10,000,000 people. We have over twice the people and twenty times the number of guns, and still less murders. Someone in Chicago should Google the history of Kennesaw, Ga.

  • Stan Carpenter

    Thank you for the welcome Mr. Bottino, I have dreamed of this day when the constitution would prevail and we can go outside our doors and not be afraid, and protect our family like all the other states in America, I have never given up hope that the laws would work for us here in Illinois. We are coming to join you America, Concealed Carry is coming to Illinois, Way Past Due Indeed…………

  • reason111

    I don’t want to insult the gun control people, so please, don’t take this as an insult. I am serious when I ask, “Why can’t you understand, a law breaker is a criminal with no morals. An abiding citizen of the law, won’t break the law. So what is it that you don’t understand about the theory that if you put a law in place that forbids guns, only the criminals will have them?”
    If you think that law abiding people will just add to the inventory of guns on the street, stop and think for a minute: They will get them anyway unless all of America bans them. That will never happen.
    Not only that, but if you’d take about 45 minutes tonight and research “Federalist Papers” and the 2nd Amendment, gun rights for the sake of burglars or hunting wasn’t even why it was put into the Bill of Rights. It was put in there so the American people would/could be armed at all times against the Tyranny of Government.
    So your argument that a citizen doesn’t need an automatic rifle, doesn’t hold weight. No, I don’t need an automatic to shoot a deer or a burglar. But I darned sure need one to fulfill the written purpose of the 2nd Amendment.
    NOW, if you say, “Well, America has evolved and that’s not the case anymore.” My response is: All parts of the Constitution is valid unless an Amendment has been submitted and passed.
    It hasn’t passed, or for that matter, even been submitted/denied.
    So read up on your history and stop with the 3rd world country you would prefer we become.
    We are America, not Europe! We fought to break away from them. We didn’t like being ruled by a government, so we fought, won, and became the strongest country on the planet in less than 80 years.
    We did that by practicing freedom! Freedom of speech, freedom of government, freedom of commerce, FREEDOM!
    If you don’t like America, move! (that sounds sarcastic, but it’s not. I mean that. Quit trying to change us. If you want a change, go through the channels. Submit for an amendment to our Constitution)

  • http://www.facebook.com/thomas.wilkerson.7 Thomas Wilkerson

    Small step but I can see them having a gun control law like Maryland where your life has to be threatened to get the permit. I just heard a news story how gun shooting is rampid in Chicago. Criminals dont care about the law so these laws only restrict law biding citizens.

  • http://profiles.google.com/theswabbie The Swabbie

    People like currie are so out of touch it’s not funny. She doesn’t even have the Intelligence to recognize she’s full of S***. As was pointed out, other states have had these laws put in place with NO SPEED BUMPS AT ALL. The other part of this is.. chicago streets are ALREADY the Wild Wild West .. its the most Dangerous city in the entire country! More murders here than in ANY other US City.

    • http://profiles.google.com/theswabbie The Swabbie

      When she says “If we need to change the law, let us at least craft a law that is very severely constrained and narrowly tailored” means they will try to make it SO HARD to get a CWP that people wont even bother.

      Its up to Illinois voters whether or not THEY want to put up with that crap or not… if not.. VOTE these Idiots OUT!

  • http://www.facebook.com/nealehumes75 Neale Humes

    It is ABOUT TIME . SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED MEANS EXACTLY THAT NOT AT THE WHIM OF SOME GUN HATING LIBTARD ILL. STATE REPRESENTATIVE. FLYNN CURRIE WILL JUST HAVE TO UN WAD HER PANTIES AND DEAL WITH THE LAW IN THE REAL WORLD NOT HER WORLD WHERE SHE IS IN COMPLETE CONTROL. GUN RIGHTS ARE UNIVERSAL AS STATED IN THE CONSTITUTION AND NOW THE LIBTARDS WILL JUST HAVE TO DEAL WITH IT. YIPPIE

  • http://www.facebook.com/james.crooke.1 James Crooke

    Do they really believe that the citizenry of their state is out of control that they must control them at every turn. Do they not believe that the vast majority of their citizens are law abiding and only seek the means to secure and defend themselves especially when the average response time for a major incident is close to 10 minutes.

  • http://www.facebook.com/paul.bottino Paul Bottino

    Way overdue. Welcome to America Illinois.

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Ken-Gardner/100000200035911 Ken Gardner

    Thank You Gun Owners of America by Protecting your rights to self protection even in the public.. I am proud of you all

  • http://www.facebook.com/reggie.walters.7 Reggie Walters

    Long overdue in my opinion.

  • Pingback: Illinois ‘Concealed Carry’ Gun Ban Struck Down By Federal Appeals Court | CFO Daily Report



Copyright 2013 TPNN -

Tea Party News Network

All Rights Reserved

Privacy Policy

Terms of Use

Become a Sponsor