Obama, Class Warfare and the Importance of Right to Work Laws

Posted 12.11.12 by Greg Campbell, TPNN Contributor

By Greg Campbell
TPNN Contributor

In an effort to shore up his “friend of the union man” cred, President Obama spoke yesterday to a crowd in Redford, Michigan. With more of the “tax the rich” rhetoric designed to inflame the masses while omitting the fact that the “rich” are the ones paying the salaries and doing the hiring, Obama spoke with frankness about the looming fiscal cliff and Michigan becoming the 24th right-to-work state.

In a campaign-style event seething with rhetoric that seemed to only be absent the central term, “worker-controlled means of production,” Obama noted,

You only have to look to Michigan -- where workers were instrumental in reviving the auto industry -- to see how unions have helped build not just a stronger middle class but a stronger America. So folks from our state’s capital, all the way to the nation’s capital, they should be focused on the same thing. They should be working to make sure companies like this manufacturer is able to make more great products. That's what they should be focused on. We don't want a race to the bottom. We want a race to the top.”

Right to work laws means providing workers more flexibility in participation of unions and how those unions are run. They provide both employees and employers enhanced decision-making capabilities and offers a solution to punishing over-regulation.

I find it odd that Obama would ask us to “look to Michigan” as a means of seeing what’s right about unions. I intend no disrespect to the fine people of Michigan or union workers who have had to choose between joining unions and not working, but Michigan has adopted a right-to-work stance precisely because the union stronghold created disaster for Michigan- because the union stronghold slowly and painfully capsized Detroit.

We want a stronger middle class; we want a “race to the top.” But in what universe is Obama’s policies coupled with unions’ job-killing extortion tactics the means of facilitating success?

In other news related to the value that unions have brought to the automotive industry, 13 Chrysler union workers who, in 2010, were fired for drinking and smoking marijuana on their lunch breaks were reinstated at their jobs this week.

Chrysler was not pleased about having their arms twisted and stated,

“While the company does not agree with the ultimate decision of the arbitrator, we respect the grievance procedure process as outlined in the collective bargaining agreement and our relationship with the (United Auto Workers union). Unfortunately, the company was put in a very difficult position because of the way the story was investigated and ultimately revealed to the public. These employees from Jefferson North have been off work for more than two years. The time has come to put this situation behind us and resume our focus on building quality products that will firmly establish Chrysler Group’s position in the marketplace.”

Thanks to union-backed arbitration, the workers who make the cars in which we drive now don’t have to fear legitimate consequences from being drunk and stoned at work- the unions will fight for their “right” to do whatever they please at the cost of public safety or overall personal responsibility.

No, the days of Pinkerton’s busting union lines have long passed. We need to focus on the best possible ways to create long-term employment opportunities, and squeezing and extorting industries is not the way to do that.



  • Pingback: http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20130117012544AA38jCZ

  • Pingback: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=939lmV0yrrk

  • Pingback: туроператор по израилю

  • Pingback: туроператор по израилю

  • http://www.facebook.com/johnnie.simpson.7 Johnnie Simpson

    Those Michigan unions are the reason all new auto plants are being built in the deep south.I don’t know how a Michigan auto maker can stay in business having to pay over $60.00 an hour.People in the south would love to have those jobs at a little less than half those wages.

  • http://www.facebook.com/ross.desautel Ross DeSautel

    Right-to-work means you have the right to work, nothing more. You will no longer have the right to living wages, benefits, or unionizing. The only unions that work in a right-to-work state are the federal unions, because they aren’t under the states thumb. Unions have a time and place, and shouldn’t be so greedy with their demands, but without Unions, non-union workers in non-union employment, wouldn’t have half of the benefits that they do have.

  • http://www.facebook.com/lynn.morrison.376 Lynn Morrison

    How is the Union the best for Michigan, when in Detroit, the Mayor is begging for more money from Washington?

  • http://surveysarereal.blogspot.com/ Flannel734

    I know for sure right to work will force the union to work harder for the workers!

    • http://www.facebook.com/ross.desautel Ross DeSautel

      Right to work takes all power away from the unions. Take it from someone in right-to-work North Dakota.

  • http://www.facebook.com/nancy.chandler.102 Nancy Chandler

    I would rather have companies compete for my talent than have YOUR taxes used to pay for politicians and their elections.

    • http://www.facebook.com/ross.desautel Ross DeSautel

      I’m not sure what your point is, but I don’t want to move to China to compete for employment. We must stop buying all foreign goods until we get our country back. It will hurt retailers until they begin demanding U.S. goods, but then again, they helped to create this mess.

  • http://www.facebook.com/caeserp Caeser Pink

    I don’t believe the federal government should restrict the right of a private company and a union of employees to negotiate and implement a contract of their choosing. Right to work is big government controlling and restricting free trade.

    • http://www.facebook.com/herbert.woodbury Herbert Lee Woodbury

      Actually, a law requiring joining a union, to get a job, is restricting free trade. Unions will also refuse to allow someone to join, BT,DT.
      BTW, for your information, this controversy is over a STATE LAW. Not federal.

    • http://www.facebook.com/ppstanislaw Peter P. Stanislaw

      You, my man, have no idea what “right to work” means. Why are you even commenting on this subject?

  • http://www.facebook.com/kcrudnick Kim Connor Rudnick

    Chrysler sold out!!!!!! They caved. Under Oblabla’s protocol let’s all carry on in a destructive, unsafe manner, and create mayhem! Let’s get drunk and let those cars pass through quality with no regard to safety issues because we were drunk and/or high. What if said employees get hurt due to lack of judgement/ behavior brought on by impairment? What if somebody purchases an unsafe vehicle that was passed through quality because of these same behaviors? Where’s OSAHA? What’s their take on this? These people created an unsafe work environment What are we thinking folks?

    • http://www.facebook.com/joan.wilcox.35 Joan Wilcox

      I am thinking that Chrysler caved because they are still partially owned by the government with the bailout they took and therefore they still are on the hook that means that the unions are in big control as they control Obuma,the only way to make sure that you dont gt one of these cars is to buy Ford, they did not take any bailout money. OASHA is part of the government under Obuma and they only go after non-union companies for safety violations and even if they are complying they find something to shut them down for. It doesn’t matter if they did create an unsafe work environment even if they get hurt on the job it will still be the companies fault for allowing them to work drunk and high regardless where the real reason lay.

  • http://www.facebook.com/terresa.simonson Terresa Simonson

    I’d rather have the right to work for less money, than the right to have less work for more people…



Copyright 2013 TPNN -

Tea Party News Network

All Rights Reserved

Privacy Policy

Terms of Use

Become a Sponsor