The Patriotism of Disobedience to Unconstitutional Laws

Posted 02.25.13 by Todd Cefaratti, Editor of TPNN

By Todd Cefaratti
Editor of TPNN

We are a nation of laws. I firmly believe that we have the obligation to follow the laws and that’s one reason why I’m so weary of this recent brand of government, whose motto is, “Don’t think, just make laws!”

We have laws that contradict other laws. We have laws that are formulated with purposefully ambiguous wording. We have laws that are too restrictive and rather than working to repeal them, lawmakers will “decriminalize” the prohibited behavior. We have laws against illegal immigration, but those laws have been countermanded by executive actions and now we’re not supposed to enforce those laws. I’ve had it!

But, above all of these laws, we have rights. We have a Bill of Rights that outlines what government cannot subject us to. These rights are not gifts from government; they’re rights afforded to the citizens.

So, what are we to do when the Constitution grants us the right to keep and bear arms without infringement, but a state or even federal law directly contradicts that?

We have two options:

First, we have the amendment process. Knowing that the world changes, the founding fathers put a unique feature into our Constitution and granted future generations the ability to amend the document. If a current regime believes that we ought not to have firearms or that we should only be allowed to have some and not others, we have a legal process to change that. Granted, an amending of the Second Amendment probably wouldn’t go well and it’s unlikely that such an amendment would pass; but regardless, we have the process to do so and to infringe upon our rights to bear arms, the Constitution would need to be changed.

The second option is a bit trickier. The second option is to remind government of our rights and stand firm against those laws which violate the Constitution. If contemporary politicians have a problem with the rights we are granted, they are certainly welcome to voice their opinions on what the Constitution should say; but as for the American citizens and the states, we have a duty to ourselves and future generations to resist laws that violate our rights.

In Texas, legislation is being considered that make it illegal for officers to enforce unconstitutional gun laws. In Missouri, there is legislation being considered that makes it a felony to propose laws which violate the Constitution. We must be vigilant against refusing to obey laws simply because we don’t like them. But we must be ever-vigilant in having the integrity to stand up and resist laws that are illegitimate and that violate our rights.



  • bornfreeamerican

    They are attacking morality…what was right is now wrong!

  • http://twitter.com/thoughtsaloud ◄Dave►

    Imprecise language fostered by Progressives, is carelessly repeated so often among conservatives that it is driving me nuts. Thus, I have vowed to make a nuisance of myself highlighting such occurrences, in hopes of raising general awareness of the issue. Our Constitution ‘affords’ or ‘grants’ us no rights or freedoms; it only ‘protects’ them from tyranny. Individual natural rights predated it, supersede it, and shall outlive it. Even if the Second Amendment could be repealed, an individual would still have the natural right of self-defense from man or beast, and to take up arms to do so.

    Freeborn Americans are citizens; not subjects, serfs, or slaves. We must always assert our Liberty and birthrights, and never use language that implies that they derive from our form of government; for that opens the door for fools to think they could be annulled or taken back on a whim. Government employees – elected or otherwise – are our public servants, not the other way ’round, and any endeavoring to nullify our individual sovereign rights, flirt with treason at their significant peril. ◄Dave►

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Jerome-McCollom/100000327150215 Jerome McCollom

    Yes, these punishments of these students were stupid. But that doesn’t logically follow we shouldnt’ have any gun regulation or increased gun regulation. It does not logically follow that we should not have background checks to ensure that violent felons don’t continue (as they do) to buy guns illegally from non federally licensed dealers. One does not equal the other. Sorry.

    • beastdogs8

      Here is a realistic thing we can and should of been doing a long time ago, how about enforcing the DAM laws we already have, in fact many of them should be rolled back and be gone, because they are totally useless, and only infringe on the rights of law abiding citizens. I was listing to the radio the other day, I do not watch much TV, I find the radio much more interesting. On the radio they were talking about background checks, recently release information showed something like 80 thousand people we denied the purchase of a gun based on these background checks, yet less than one hundred of these people who were denied the purchase of a gun were prosecuted, that is ridiculous and should be embarrassing. I refuse to budge an inch on my right to own a gun, it is very naive and dangerous to think that felons are not going be able to get a gun, if they want one no matter what new rule or law is passed. So yes, I am on record to say, I rather nothing be done at all, than for another useless law to be rammed though, that will do nothing but infringe on my rights as a law abiding citizen.

  • http://www.facebook.com/frank.champagne1 Frank Champagne

    All of which means that home schooling is now by far the most viable option. Who wants their kids educated by neurotics?

    • Orwellian States

      I look for Dear Leader to find a way to outlaw home schooling. It seems that several states are making it difficult to home school. I wish I could recall the article.



Copyright 2013 TPNN -

Tea Party News Network

All Rights Reserved

Privacy Policy

Terms of Use

Become a Sponsor